A place for serious, deep discussions, intellectual stimulation, philosophy, meta-perspectives and thorough reflections.
- Community Admin
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 302
- Joined: 2 years ago
- Nickname(s): The Voice of Reason
- CDW: ✅ Count me in!
- My democracy level: BLC (8-11)
- Profile news headline: Think Tank Launch | Think-Tank-Start
Blockchain opens Pandora's box for all kinds of malicious content to be uploaded that cannot easily be regulated, from harassment (eg publishing personal data like home addresses for any attackers' delight, libel, insults, fake porn to incriminate targeted persons etc) up to high crime and instructions that can and probably will cost actual human lives. Free speech without limits will be abused heavily, that is a sociopsychological certainty, as with all freedoms that are not met with equal or greater responsibility and wisdom.
A blockchain fan recently argued that as a website owner, I was already practising a decentralized internet, which they claimed was the same as blockchain.
But no, I have central control over my data and that of my client users, and when on my website I or any of my client users were to host malicious/criminal content, it could easily be regulated. And that's a reasonable necessity. It also has abuse potential, mostly of censorship, but that weighs far less than the risks that I see from blockchain and other darknet technologies.
I am an anarchist and strive for a society of self-determination by self-administration in self-responsibility, but I'm not an anomist, seeking the chaos of anything-goes, which will inevitably always lead again to hierarchical power structures, causing lots of jungle law mayhem on its way.
Users browsing this forum: Please log in or register to populate the community. and 1 guest